“One
thing is needful” (Luke 10:42)
With fear I begin to write this. For in
many ways, what I have next to say is too hard for words, and can so easily be
taken the wrong way. I ask in advance your forgiveness if I fail to hit the
mark.
Ofttimes a friend or family member not
active in amateur astronomy might express surprise at the exacting conditions
necessary for a good night of observing. Far more than merely cloudless skies
are called for. Overly high humidity can cause one’s lenses and mirrors to dew
up, rendering them useless. Even on nights of relatively low humidity, surface
temperatures falling below the dew point can result in eyepieces fogging up,
making further observation impossible. Winds of greater than a few miles per hour
can make telescopes too unsteady to operate or induce vibrations that make the
image shake intolerably. Even when the air is calm and steady at ground level,
high winds aloft (as when the jet stream is passing overhead) can result in a
view similar to looking at a river bed through swiftly flowing water, with the
stars or planets appearing to boil and dance before one’s eyes.
In my own astronomy club, when one member
wishes to make a night of it, he will send out an e-mail to the others to see
whether anyone else is interested in joining him. Frequently on nights of less
than ideal conditions, it’s not surprising to see most people responding “some
other time.” I myself, if I’m left uninspired by some not quite perfect
evening, have been known to turn down the chance for a night out under the
stars, knowing that a better one will come along soon enough. And to be honest,
stargazing is a hobby. There’s no
obligation to go out when you’re tired, the conditions are lousy, or even when
you just don’t feel like it.
But there’s a curious flaw to our
reasoning when we reject some nights as unacceptable for viewing. We confuse
ourselves with our stuff – our lenses
and mirrors, our telescopes and tripods, our eyepieces and mounts. The fact is
that some of the best nights for stargazing are precisely those worst for our
equipment. For one thing, it forces one to concentrate on those objects that
cannot really be observed with optical aid, or are best looked at without it:
the constellations themselves, the giant arch of the Summer Milky Way, the
Pleiades, the occasional meteor, or planetary and lunar conjunctions. And while
a bit of wind up there might make the view through an eyepiece a singularly
frustrating experience, by naked eye alone it adds greatly to your pleasure by
putting that extra twinkle in the stars.
Such nights are times to get out into an
open field away from the lights and just look up. It’s amazing how there’s
always some new insight to be gained by “taking it all in” instead of boring in
on some small detail of the sky. Rather than hunting down a single very
specific star, I can glory in the massed splendor of the entire galaxy, as seen
from the inside. And I still find myself trying to make out the larger and
brighter Deep Sky Objects, such as the Beehive, the Great Nebula in Orion, the
Andromeda Galaxy, the Lagoon Nebula, or the Double Cluster in Perseus. Finding
one of these always causes me to marvel that I had never noticed them in all
the years before I decided to take up this hobby. Once you know where to look,
they seem so obvious.
So while I can’t deny the very real value
of astronomical gear, I have to admit that it is not the one needful thing in order to appreciate the sky. And it’s not just
true for stargazing. I literally cannot count the number of times in my life
where I’ve convinced myself that “all I need is to have [fill in the blank],
and I’ll be so happy.” It’s just that the results are so much more painfully
apparent with this particular pastime. My equipment boxes are littered with
“had to have” eyepieces, tripods, and various other accessories that seemed so
essential at the time, but now take up room and gather dust. It was a hard
lesson to learn before it sank in that more stuff did not equal more happiness.
I would have done better to have taken earlier heed of the words “a man’s life
does not consist in the abundance of his possessions” (Luke 12:15).
But so far we have only scratched the
surface of the real issue here. This has been the easy part. Learning to rein
in one’s acquisitive impulses, to realize how little we truly do need (as
essential as that realization is) is but the merest prelude to the Main Event.
And that is how we deal with loss.
My heart breaks every time I hear an
account of individuals and families who have lost everything they own (or
worse, everyone they loved) in a fire, flood, hurricane, or some manmade
disaster like war or other violence. And always, just one step behind that
vicarious grief, is the feeling of relief that such hasn’t happened to myself.
For I have somehow escaped in my own life the catastrophe of losing everything.
The closest I’ve come is when Diane died seven years ago. But even in
that blackest of moments, I still had my two wonderful daughters, my utterly indispensable
sister-in-law and the rest of her family, and the invaluable support of my
brother. My loss was real, but it was far from total.
In the final analysis, no one’s loss is
ever really total. Yes, we can lose
our property, our livelihood, our family and everyone we love. We can see the
defeat of all that we cherish and hold dear. We can (and will) eventually lose
our own life. But we can be assured that on that other side of death, there is
Someone waiting to welcome us in, to console us beyond our imagining, to truly
make all right once more (and forever). There has really been only one Person
ever of whom it can be said that He lost everything.
We read in Paul that Christ “was in the form of God” (Philippians 2:6), but
that rather than clinging to His status, He “emptied himself” and willingly
embraced poverty, pain, suffering and death itself. Just ask yourself this –
when God dies, who is there on the other side to welcome Him? This is a great
mystery beyond our comprehension. It is so simple to recite the Creed, and to
say the words that the Son is submissive to the Father unto death, but it is
impossible to understand the greater part of what such words really mean. And
when we realize that we are probing into the very nature of God Himself, that
suffering and loss are fundamental to the very source of existence itself, then
we see that the experience of loss is baked into the DNA of the universe. It is
an essential part, not only of the way things are, but of the way they are
supposed to be.
At my wife’s funeral, I somehow managed to
speak a few words:
These
past 14 months, I have every day been consumed by a grief I never knew it
possible to experience. Those near me could see that it was at times all but
unbearable. And I am fully aware that I am nowhere near the end.
And yet I would not trade that grief for
anything in the world. For if there is one thing that I have learned from this,
it is that grief is the price we pay for love. The only way we can shut grief
out of our life is to shut out love. And such a life would not be worth the
living.
These words come back to me whenever I
stand out in that field sans appareillage,
looking up at the Heavens with nothing but my own two eyes. “God is Love”, the
apostle John tells us, and it appears that love requires loss. And if anything
at all can be called the One Needful Thing, it is Love.
Jupiter
(near bottom, through the trees) and Mercury (at upper right) seen just after
sunset, 19 March 2011
No comments:
Post a Comment